Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, getting a general score of 82.7 against 77.7. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's construction is older, thicker and somewhat heavier than the OPPO Find X2 Neo. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a quite larger display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit more pixels per inch of screen and a much brighter display. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures a little bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos or videos in low-light situations, and they both have a camera with a 48 MP resolution, a same size back camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery performance in OPPO Find X2 Neo, although the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a 1% lower battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.