Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black, Blue and Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a general score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 general score. Although it's the best in this comparison, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 construction is older, a little bit thicker and a lot heavier than the OPPO Find X2 Neo. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a little bit better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has more display brightness, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bigger display and a quite better screen density.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos, a larger aperture and a back facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Neo and Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 both have extremely similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have equal internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Neo has better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.