Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, having an 81.6 score against 77.7. These devices have the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. Although it's the best cellphone we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC design is noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than the OPPO Find X2 Neo.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a really brighter display and a just a bit greater screen pixels density.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features just a bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality and a lot more MP back-facing camera.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.