Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a global score of 81.1 against 77.7. Both devices we compare here come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should give the same OS features. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a better cellphone than OPPO Find X2 Neo, it must be noted that it's also a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a quite higher count of pixels per inch in the display. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has more RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes slightly better videos and photos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher 64 MP resolution back camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.