Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a global score of 79, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10, so it offers some additional features and improved performance. Although it's the best in our current comparison, we must tell that it is also a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker phone.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a just a bit greater pixel count in each inch in the display. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same back-facing camera sensor size and a same resolution back facing camera, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a bigger aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.