Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Ocean | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's global score of 83.1. The iPhone XS is an older phone than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, but Apple made it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen, more brightness, a higher 1440 x 3168px resolution and a bigger screen.
The Apple iPhone XS counts with a little faster CPU than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger aperture for better low light images and videos, a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with lot more megapixels.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has much more storage to install applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has 512 GB internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has a 60 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.