Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a global score of 83.1, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3's 80 score. Even though OPPO Find X2 Pro is newer than Google Pixel 3, it is thicker and noticeably heavier. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a bigger screen, a better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger camera aperture and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.