Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, having a overall score of 83.1 against 80.7. Although OPPO Find X2 Pro is newer than the Google Pixel 3 XL, it's heavier and somewhat thicker. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a just a little worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a quite bigger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 448 GB more internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features greater battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity instead of 3430mAh. OPPO Find X2 Pro takes a lot better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos, a back facing camera with a lot better resolution, better video frame rate and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.