Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, having a global score of 83.1 against 78.8. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has the older 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11. Although OPPO Find X2 Pro is newer than the Google Pixel 3a, it's notably heavier and a little thicker.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a quite higher display pixel density and a larger display. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4260mAh battery size. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low light environments, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a back facing camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor shooting much higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.