Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Ocean | Just black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4a, getting an 83.1 score against 82.9. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 version. Even being the best in this comparison, OPPO Find X2 Pro is a just a little thicker and extremely heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 4a.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a just a bit greater display pixel density, a larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3168. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better processor than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has more internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.7 camera aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a much bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4260mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.