Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Ocean | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting an 87.5 score against 83.1. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is lighter and just a bit thinner than OPPO Find X2 Pro, even when they were released with only a couple months difference. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version, giving you some extra features.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels, a quite bigger screen and a bit higher pixel density. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features much more storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much larger back camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality and a back-facing camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.