Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 519 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is slightly better than HTC One M9, having a global score of 83.1 against 77.7. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has newer 10 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0. The OPPO Find X2 Pro construction is notably newer and just a little bit thinner, but way heavier than HTC One M9.
The HTC One M9 features just a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a GPU and a 64-bits processor. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit more vivid display than HTC One M9, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels, a little more pixels per inch in the display and a lot larger display.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much larger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures, a back camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution, a lot bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has much more memory to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a way better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.