Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 519 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is slightly better than the HTC U11, having a general score of 83.1 against 77.6. OPPO Find X2 Pro's body is much newer than HTC U11's, but it is thicker and heavier. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a slightly better display than HTC U11, because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a larger display.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a superior memory for applications and games than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little better processing power than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than HTC U11, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a lot more MP camera in the back, better video frame rates and a way bigger camera sensor taking much better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.