Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Ocean | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting an 84.3 score against 83.1. These phones include Android OS, but the LG G8 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives you lots of additional features. LG G8 ThinQ is an older phone than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, but it is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner anyway.
LG G8 ThinQ features a screen that is very similar to the OPPO Find X2 Pro one, because although the LG G8 ThinQ has much lower brightness, a bit smaller display and a little worse 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixels density. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better processor than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much better photos and videos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 4260mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.