Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Ocean | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is slightly better than the LG G8S ThinQ, getting a overall score of 83.1 against 82.5. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has older 10 version while LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. The OPPO Find X2 Pro construction is newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than LG G8S ThinQ.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a more vivid display than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a better 1440 x 3168 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a greater pixel density.
OPPO Find X2 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a larger camera aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has superior battery duration than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 20% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.