Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-07-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Ocean | Gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a global score of 83.1, which is a little bit better than the LG Q8's 77.2 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but OPPO Find X2 Pro has older 10 version while LG Q8 has Android 7.0 Nougat version. OPPO Find X2 Pro's construction is noticeably newer than LG Q8's, but it is way heavier and thicker.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little faster CPU than LG Q8, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little bit better looking display than LG Q8, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a lot brighter screen, a bigger screen and a little bit higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than LG Q8, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than LG Q8, because it has a 42 percent greater battery size.
OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than LG Q8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos, better video frame rate, a camera with a much better 48 MP resolution and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.