Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a score of 83.1, which is just a bit better than the LG V10's 78.6 general score. Even though the OPPO Find X2 Pro is way newer than the LG V10, it's just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has the newer 10 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, providing lots of additional features.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a greater processing power than LG V10, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and more processing cores. LG V10 counts with a screen that's very similar to the OPPO Find X2 Pro one, although the LG V10 has a little less pixels per inch of screen, a bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little smaller screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a better camera than LG V10, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations, a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than LG V10, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a really longer battery life than LG V10, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.