Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Ocean | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a little bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, with a general score of 83.1 against 82.5. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has an older 10 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a a lot newer device than LG V30S ThinQ, but it is somewhat thicker and much heavier.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit sharper screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 3168px resolution and a bit larger display. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a slightly better storage to store more games and applications than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro captures greater photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back, a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos and faster video frame rate.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has longer battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4260mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.