Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Ocean | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting an 83.1 score against 81.3. Even though the OPPO Find X2 Pro is newer than LG V35 ThinQ, it's somewhat thicker and much heavier. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit sharper display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a little larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better memory to install applications and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4260mAh battery size. The OPPO Find X2 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.