Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Ocean | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, having an 87.1 score against 83.1. LG Velvet's design is thinner and lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, although they were released only 0 months apart. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a higher screen density.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little better processing power than LG Velvet, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots slightly better photographs and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same video quality and a back facing camera with a 48 mega pixels resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has better video frame rates, a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot bigger sensor.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a slightly better storage to store more apps and games than LG Velvet, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The LG Velvet counts with a battery life that is very similar to the OPPO Find X2 Pro one, although the LG Velvet also has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.