Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Ocean | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's general score of 83.1. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, offering some additional features. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is noticeably newer, a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Pro.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little lower pixel number per inch in the display, and they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with way more brightness.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. They have the same number of cores and 12 GB of RAM. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Pro, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with a better 50 megapixels resolution, a larger diafragm aperture and a bigger camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's memory capacity to store more games and applications is very similar to the OPPO Find X2 Pro one, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.