Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Ocean | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Play, having an 83.1 score against 77.4. The OPPO Find X2 Pro construction is newer, but noticeably thicker and extremely heavier than the Moto Z2 Play. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a sharper display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3168 resolution, a greater pixel count in each inch of screen and a bigger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a very superior memory for games and applications than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a superior battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 42% more battery capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has faster video frame rates and a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.