Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Ocean | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has an overall score of 83.1, which is slightly better than Motorola One Hyper's global score of 79.8. These devices work with Android OS, but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has the older 10 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version. The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a a little bit heavier phone than the Motorola One Hyper, but both have the same thickness.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better display than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution, a greater count of pixels per inch of display and a little bit larger screen.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a way lower 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a bit better battery life than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.