Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Nokia |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Ocean | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | -- |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a global score of 83.1, which is slightly better than the Nokia XR20's 80.8 global score. Despite of the fact that the OPPO Find X2 Pro is older than the Nokia XR20, it's body is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner. Both devices we compare here include Android operating system, but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has the older 10 version and Nokia XR20 has Android 11.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better looking display than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher pixels amount per inch in the display, a better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a brighter display. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Nokia XR20, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit better performance than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nokia XR20 has just a bit longer battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 4260mAh.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a much better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.