Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Ocean | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, with an 83.1 score against 76.2. These devices have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both of them should provide very similar operating system features. The OPPO Find X2 Pro body is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5S, although they were only released 4 months apart.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px, more pixels per display inch and more brightness. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has more internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little faster processing unit than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 5S takes clearer videos and photos than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a tinier sensor taking less light and duller colors, it also counts with a much higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera and a much better video definition.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has just a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 6% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.