Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Ocean | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has an overall score of 83.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A30s's global score of 79.8. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A30s has Android 11. Even being the best in this review, OPPO Find X2 Pro is a heavier and somewhat thicker phone than Samsung Galaxy A30s.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A30s, because it has a much greater pixel density, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a little bit larger display. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A30s, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way more MP back-facing camera and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.