Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Ocean | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy A41, with a score of 83.1 against 81.7. Although the OPPO Find X2 Pro is better than Galaxy A41, we must highlight that it's also somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but OPPO Find X2 Pro has an older 10 version and Galaxy A41 has Android 11.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a quite bigger screen. OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 48 MP resolution and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a bigger aperture, a much bigger sensor taking way higher quality photographs and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features longer battery performance than Galaxy A41, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.