Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Ocean | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy A5 (2017), getting a overall score of 83.1 against 75.8. The OPPO Find X2 Pro design is newer, but somewhat thicker and much heavier than Galaxy A5 (2017). OPPO Find X2 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a larger display, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a just a bit better count of pixels in each screen inch.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a back-facing camera with much more MP and a bigger aperture. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 42 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.