Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's overall score of 83.1. Although the Galaxy A50 is older than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, it's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168, a greater screen pixels density and a quite bigger display.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way better video definition, a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.