Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Ocean | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a score of 86.6 against 83.1. Galaxy A50s's body is thinner and somewhat lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, although they were released with only 7 months difference. Both devices in this comparison review come with the same Android 10 operating system, so both of them should provide the user very similar OS features.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a sharper display than Galaxy A50s, because it has a quite larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 and more pixels per inch in the screen. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video quality and a same resolution camera, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has higher video frame rates, a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited environments.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.