Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Ocean | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's overall score of 83.1. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but Galaxy A51 has 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10. The Galaxy A51 is a somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, even when both of them were released with only a couple of months difference.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A51, because it has a better count of pixels per display inch, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a little bit larger screen.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features much more memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 4260mAh battery size.
OPPO Find X2 Pro captures clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have a camera with a 48 MP and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and videos and higher video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.