Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Ocean | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a score of 90.8 against 83.1. Even when the Galaxy A51 5G and the OPPO Find X2 Pro were released only 1 months apart, the Galaxy A51 5G is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a better display density, a little larger display and a better 1440 x 3168px resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A51 5G features a bit superior battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 6% bigger battery size.
OPPO Find X2 Pro takes just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same resolution back facing camera, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way bigger camera sensor taking much better quality photographs, better video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.