Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Ocean | -- |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a 91.3 score against 83.1. Galaxy A52 5G's design is newer, a bit thinner and a bit lighter than OPPO Find X2 Pro. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides you some extra features.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels, a little bigger display and a better display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a camera that is very similar to the OPPO Find X2 Pro one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has slower 30 fps video frame rates, a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality pictures and a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing images or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, it also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a little better battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.