Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Ocean | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 general score. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52s has 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10. The Galaxy A52s design is newer, just a little lighter and a little bit thinner than the OPPO Find X2 Pro.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A52s, because it has a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution, a little bigger display and a better number of pixels per display inch. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features more storage for games and applications than Galaxy A52s, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 6% larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A52s's camera is just as good as the camera in OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.