Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a score of 83.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's general score of 76.9. The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a newer device than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a better pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has faster 60 fps video frame rates and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features just a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 6 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.