Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Ocean | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting an 87.5 score against 83.1. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 has a newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, so it gives a couple nice extra features. The Galaxy A71 construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Find X2 Pro, even when they were released only 3 months apart.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater pixels density and a better 1440 x 3168 resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 features a little better battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 shoots clearer pictures and videos than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has lower video frame rates, a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality photographs and videos and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.