Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Ocean | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting an 85.2 score against 83.1. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy F41 has newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10. The Galaxy F41 body has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, but it is a little lighter.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has much more brightness, a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen, a little bit bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM. Galaxy F41 has a really longer battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 41 percent greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy F41's camera is very similar to the camera in OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although the Samsung Galaxy F41 has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos, a tinier sensor and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.