Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Ocean | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting an 88.1 score against 83.1. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy F62 design is newer, but just a bit heavier and just a little thicker than the OPPO Find X2 Pro.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a better count of pixels per inch in the screen, a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a much brighter screen. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy F62, because it has 6 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a camera with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger sensor shooting higher quality photos and videos and a bigger aperture for better captures in low light situations.
Galaxy F62 features a way better battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 64 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.