Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Ocean | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting a 97.6 score against 83.1. These devices come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version. The Galaxy Fold design is way heavier but thinner than OPPO Find X2 Pro, and they were released with only 8 months difference.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a better screen pixel density. The Galaxy Fold and OPPO Find X2 Pro count with really similar processors, they have a 12 GB RAM memory and 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as OPPO Find X2 Pro, both of them have the same 512 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Fold counts with a little better battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 4260mAh.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a much larger back camera sensor and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.