Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Ocean | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M40 has a score of 85, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 overall score. Both phones we are comparing here include the same Android 10 OS, so both of them should provide you identical operating system features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M40 is older than OPPO Find X2 Pro, it's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M40, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a more vivid display than Galaxy M40, because it has a little larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.7 camera aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has better video frame rates, a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy M40, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.