Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Ocean | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 519 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting an 87.7 score against 83.1. These devices work with the same Android 10 operating system. The Galaxy M51 is better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, we must note that it is also just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little better performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher 1440 x 3168px resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch of screen. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a way less mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lower video quality, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy M51, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy M51 features a way better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.