Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Ocean | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's global score of 83.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 design is a bit thinner and just a little lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, even when they were released with only a couple months difference.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro and the Galaxy Note 20 feature similar processing units, and although the Galaxy Note 20 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has higher 60 fps video frame rates, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light environments and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery lifetime in OPPO Find X2 Pro, although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a 4300mAh battery capacity instead of 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.