Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Ocean | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 general score. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, providing lots of additional features and a performance increase. Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and OPPO Find X2 Pro were released only a couple of months apart, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is just a little thinner but a little bit heavier than OPPO Find X2 Pro.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a little better processing power than OPPO Find X2 Pro. They have 12 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution and a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior camera than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor, a way higher video resolution and a way better 108 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little longer battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.