Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a global score of 83.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 general score. OPPO Find X2 Pro's construction is way newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition. OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a slightly better 1440 x 3168 resolution, a larger display and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same camera aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much better resolution camera, a much larger sensor and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.