Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a general score of 83.1, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3's global score of 77.7. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. OPPO Find X2 Pro's body is newer, but just a bit thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note3.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy Note3, because it has 9 GB more RAM memory and 4 more cores. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater pixels quantity in each display inch, a larger screen and a much better 1440 x 3168 resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and video, a much higher resolution camera in the back, higher video frame rates and a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.