Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Ocean | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note5, having an 83.1 score against 80.2. Even though OPPO Find X2 Pro is incredibly newer than Samsung Galaxy Note5, it is heavier and thicker. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note5, because it has a larger screen, a bit higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution and a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note5, because it has 448 GB more internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger camera aperture for better low light captures, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.