Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Ocean | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy Note8, getting a score of 83.1 against 83. The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a newer device than Galaxy Note8, but it's just a little heavier and a little thicker. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but OPPO Find X2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Galaxy Note8 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a bit lower pixels number per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a little bigger display. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note8, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a 4260mAh battery size.
OPPO Find X2 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, higher video frame rate and a way larger sensor shooting much better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.