Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Ocean | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a general score of 88.3 against 83.1. Samsung Galaxy S10 is an older device than OPPO Find X2 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it much lighter and thinner. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better looking display than Galaxy S10, because although it has a little inferior pixels amount in each display inch, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a little bit larger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera with much more megapixels.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro features better battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.