Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Ocean | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, with a global score of 93.6 against 83.1. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy S10 5G has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version. Galaxy S10 5G's construction is just a bit lighter and thinner than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, although it was released only 12 months before.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a quite higher number of pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has more internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.