Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Ocean | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's score of 83.1. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy S20 is a thinner and extremely lighter cellphone than OPPO Find X2 Pro, even though they were released only a few months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a processor that's very similar to the CPU in OPPO Find X2 Pro, both have the same number of cores and 12 GB of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S20, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch and a little bit worse resolution of 1440 x 3168px, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S20, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger aperture, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality, a much higher resolution camera in the back and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.